Date: Thursday, July 08, 2010
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP (“BLG”)
yesterday hosted a seminar for delegates from across the London
insurance market on recent developments in the international
regulatory landscape for directors and officers of commercial
companies and financial institutions.
One of the main sources of claims on non-North
American directors’ & officers’ (“D&O”) policies relates to
regulatory and criminal investigations. These types of
investigation are increasing, both in number and in international
scope, and D&O insurers cannot afford to ignore the challenges
that these developments pose.
The guest speaker was Derek Adler, partner in
US firm Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, who specialises in
representing firms in white-collar criminal investigations.
Derek gave an overview of the workings of the US Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and its implications for company
executives.
An overview of regulatory exposures for
directors and officers in Hong Kong and China was given by BLG
senior associate, Antony Sassi.
Turning to the position in the UK, the
wide-ranging implications of the Bribery Act 2010 for directors and
officers and their insurers was discussed by BLG partner James
Cooper.
BLG partners Roderic McLauchlan and James
Roberts considered the coverage issues that are relevant in
relation to criminal and regulatory investigation cover. In
particular, James considered the High Court decision which made
waves earlier this year in Safeways v
Twigger. The company in this case sought to recover
corporate fines imposed for breach of competition law through a
claim against its directors and employees bringing the D&O
cover into play. Whether such a claim is legally valid will
be considered further by the Court of Appeal later this year.
The event was wrapped up with a panel
discussion on topics including: the challenges for insurers posed
by the confidentiality of investigations into their insureds;
companies “eating their own” - where a new board might turn on past
management during an investigation; and how regulators can try to
exploit differences in protection for witnesses in different
jurisdictions.
BLG partner Roderic McLauchlan, who chaired
the seminar, commented: “In the wake of the National Australia Bank
decision of the US Supreme Court, the exposure to civil claims for
the D&O insurers of non-US companies may have decreased.
But the risks of business practice proceedings, like bribery
prosecutions and other investigations by government agencies like
the SFO, SEC and US Department of Justice, are growing
rapidly. These are becoming a significant cause of claims on
D&O policies for non-US companies. Moreover, the marked
increase in cooperation between agencies from different countries
in such investigations raises novel issues, of procedural and
insurance coverage, and significantly increases the complexity and
expense of such matters.”